|
|
||
|
Comedy
director David Zucker goes to GOP? You can't be
serious!
|
|
BEYOND
NORTH KOREA
![]()
|
|||
HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006 |
|
ALERT!
SECURITY MOMS
|
'KILL
BILL' If not the
Democrats then who? Who benefits from the odd
timing? And who has the means, the motive, the
opportunity--and the m.o.--
1,
2
to
pull off this dirty trick? WHO
BENEFITS? The
clintons had been hemorrhaging ever since the
first week in September when the husband, by
attempting to quash the ABC movie, "The Path to
9/11," managed to accomplish in mere days what
his opponents failed for years to effectuate,
namely, to focus the electorate simultaneously
on the clinton jackboot 3,
4
and on the clinton failure to confront
terrorism. 5
If the
story had legs, continued clinton stupidity and
arrogance made them sprint. And as if
dispatching the tired clinton scold, the tired
clinton spinners and the tired clinton playbook
weren't enough to keep story on page one of
The New York Times above the fold,
clinton brought his tired clinton shtick to
FoxNews Sunday. 'KILL
BILL' What the
country finally learned--fittingly on the fifth
anniversary of 9/11--was that clinton didn't
simply fail to kill bin Laden. Clinton
refused to kill or even capture
bin Laden. Clinton
refused to kill or even capture bin Laden
even as he pretended to go after bin
Laden. Clinton
refused to kill or even capture bin Laden even
as he pretended to go after bin Laden because
killing or even capturing bin Laden would have
denied clinton the Nobel Peace Prize and he
couldn't let us know he valued the prize more
than keeping this country safe.
6,
7 VIRTUAL
SURREALITY A virtual
kill of bin Laden seems apt. One should never
expect more of bill clinton. And there is a
certain symmetry, a perfect parry for clinton's
'virtual
obsession.'
9 The
Other Nixon With
everyone beginning to understand the dynamics of
the clinton failure to fight terrorism,
8
prospects
appeared even bleaker for the quondam shoo-in
and for her husband's legacy, to which said
prospects are inextricably bound. As long as
the voters believe the clintons willfully failed
to kill or even capture bin Laden--and worse,
that they did so for reasons of
self-aggrandizement--there can be no scenario in
which they recapture the White House. Hence,
bill clinton's 'virtual
kill'
on Fox Sunday morning. Although
"kill him" must have polled really, really well,
the interview didn't help the clintons; the
story remained on page one... and the
hemorrhaging continued... That is,
until the Foley scandal hit the fan.... "Mr.
bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was
expelled from Saudi Arabia in '91 and
he went to the Sudan. We'd
been hearing that the Sudanese wanted
America to start dealing with them
again. They released him [bin
Laden]. At
the time, '96, he had committed no
crime against America, so
I
did not bring him
here
because we had no basis on which to
hold him, though
we knew he wanted to commit crimes
against
America. So
I pleaded with the Saudis to take him,
'cause they could have; but they
thought it was a hot potato. They
didn't and that's how he wound up in
Afghanistan." bill
clinton "I
remember exactly what happened. Bruce
Lindsey said to me on the phone, 'My
God, a second plane has hit the tower.'
And I said, 'Bin Laden did this.'
that's the first thing I said. He said,
'How can you be sure?' I said 'Because
only bin Laden and the Iranians could
set up the network to do this and they
[the Iranians] wouldn't do it
because they have a country in targets.
Bin
Laden did
it.'
I
thought that
my
virtual
obsession
2
with him was well placed and I was full
of regret that I didn't get
him." bill
clinton hillary
clinton "In
this interdependent world, we should
still have a preference for peace over
war.... But
sometimes we would have these debates
where people would say, if I didn't
take some military action this very
day, people would look down their nose
at America and think we were
weak. And I always thought of
Senator
Fulbright.... 6
So
anytime somebody said in my presence,
'Hey, if you don't do this, people will
think you're weak,'
I
always asked the same question for
eight years, 'Can we kill 'em
tomorrow?'
I
don't think we can bring 'em back
tomorrow, but can we kill 'em
tomorrow? If we can kill them
tomorrow, then we're not weak....
1
I
learned that as a 20-year-old kid
watching Bill Fulbright.
Listening." bill
clinton The
president seems to be able, the former
president seems to be able to deny
facts with impunity.
Bin
Laden is alive today because Mr.
Clinton, Mr. Sandy Berger, and Mr.
Richard Clarke refused to kill
him.
That's the bottom line. And every time
he says what he said to Chris Wallace
on Fox, he defames the CIA especially,
and the men and women who risk their
lives to give his administration
repeated chances to kill bin Laden."
...
[T]he fact of the matter is
that the Bush Administration had one
chance that they botched, and
the
Clinton Administration had eight to ten
chances that they refused to
try.
At least at Tora Bora our forces were
on the ground. We didn't push the
point. But
it's just, it's an incredible kind of
situation for the American people over
the weekend to hear their former
president mislead
them."
Michael
Scheuer These
are not ordinary times. America is
waging the global War on Terror; the
uncharted territory of asymmetric
netherworlds is the battlefield; the
enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat
of global
conflagration
is real. Defeating
the enemy isn't sufficient. For America
to prevail, she must also defeat a
retrograde, misogynous mindset. To
successfully prosecute the War on
Terror, it is essential that the
collective patriarchal islamic culture
perceives America as politically and
militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted,
this requirement presents an
insurmountable hurdle for any female
presidential candidate, and especially
missus clinton,
It
is ironic that had the clintons not
failed
utterly to fight
terrorism...
not
failed to take bin Laden from
Sudan...
not
failed repeatedly to decapitate a
nascent, still stoppable al
Qaeda...
the generic female president as a
construct would still be viable...
missus clinton's obstacles would be
limited largely to standard-issue
clintonisms: corruption, abuse,
malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania,
rape and treason... and, in spite of
Juanita
Broaddrick,
or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie
would be reduced to perversely hawking
the "First Gentleman" instead of the
"Commander-in-Chief." Mia
T, 10.02.05
THE
CLINTON-FOLEY NEXUS: A THEORY


he
timing of
the Foley revelations is a bit odd. If the
intended beneficiary of the political dirty
trick was the Democrats, surely the perpetrators
would have sprung it closer to Election Day. A
month is an eternity in politics (irrespective
of the fact that it is the pundit class'
favorite hedge).
TEMPUS
ACTUM
Mia T

VIRTUAL
KILL
THE
CHRIS WALLACE-BILL CLINTON INTERVIEW
DECONSTRUCTED
by Mia T, 9.27.06
Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton
Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition
Offer
Sunday, Sept 3, 2002
Larry King Live
Saturday, Jan. 28, 2006
Chitchat with Jane Pauley
San Francisco, CA
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006
CBS Terror Expert, Iraq War
Critic
former CIA head for hunting Bin
Laden
Monday CBS Early
Show
...
While America appears not to be ready
for a female president under any
circumstances, the post-9/11 realities
pose special problems for a female
presidential candidate. Add to these
the problems unique to missus clinton.
The reviews make the mistake of
focusing on the problems of the generic
female presidential candidate running
during ordinary times.
historically
antimilitary--(an image,
incidentally, that is only enhanced
today by her clumsy, termagant parody
of Thatcher), forever
the pitiful
victim,
and, according to Dick Morris, "the
biggest dove in the clinton
administration."
HILLARY'S
COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF
PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)
- by Mia T, 9.26.06
CBS Terror Expert, Iraq War Critic and former CIA head for hunting Bin Laden on Monday CBS Early Show....
Harry Smith: "Elizabeth Palmer live in Pakistan this morning, thank you. I'm going to go back now to Michael Scheuer once again. Let's talk about what President Clinton had to say on Fox yesterday. He basically laid blame at the feet of the CIA and the FBI for not being able to certify or verify that Osama bin Laden was responsible for a number of different attacks. Does that ring true to you?"
Michael Scheuer: "No, sir, I don't think so. The president seems to be able, the former president seems to be able to deny facts with impunity. Bin Laden is alive today because Mr. Clinton, Mr. Sandy Berger, and Mr. Richard Clarke refused to kill him. That's the bottom line. And every time he says what he said to Chris Wallace on Fox, he defames the CIA especially, and the men and women who risk their lives to give his administration repeated chances to kill bin Laden."
Harry Smith: "All right, is the Bush administration any less responsible for not finishing the job in Tora Bora?"
Michael Scheuer: "Oh, I think there's plenty of blame to go around, sir, but the fact of the matter is that the Bush Administration had one chance that they botched, and the Clinton Administration had eight to ten chances that they refused to try. At least at Tora Bora our forces were on the ground. We didn't push the point. But it's just, it's an incredible kind of situation for the American people over the weekend to hear their former president mislead them."
HEAR 'THE PATH TO 9/11' SCREENWRITER:
CLINTON WILLFULLY FAILED TO NAIL BIN LADEN
AS MANY AS A DOZEN TIMES: CIA
"I have heard from other CIA people that there was as many as a dozen incidents, missions, etc. where the will was not there to green-light the operation. And everybody was in place, whether it was a missile attack, a bomb run, an ambush of bin Laden by tribals on the ground, or that they had pinpointed him at Tarnak Farm or his hunting lodge.
There were numerous opportunities. We only focused on one. We used it as sort of an amalgamation of the numerous different opportunities because you can't show a dozen attempts in a movie; and I don't think a lot of people would have been happy if we did that either...."
CYRUS NOWRASTEH
'THE PATH TO 9/11' WRITER, PRODUCER
THE SEAN HANNITY SHOW, SEPT. 8, 2006
'The Path to 9/11'
CLINTON FAILURE TO ORDER 'PURE KILL' CUT CHANCES OF GETTING BIN LADEN IN HALF 8
(WHICH TIPPING HIM OFF QUICKLY REDUCED TO ZERO) 9
'WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN"
(DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)
Part Two:
- by Mia t, 9.8.06
9/11 Commission: Clinton Refused to Let CIA Kill Bin Laden
Announcing some of its preliminary findings on Wednesday, the 9/11 Commission has confirmed that President Clinton ordered the CIA to take Osama bin Laden alive or not at all - a directive that made the task of neutralizing the terrorist kingpin infinitely more difficult.
In a statement read at the beginning of Wednesday's session, 9/11 staffer Michael Hurley revealed:
"CIA senior managers, operators and lawyers uniformly said that they read the relevant authorities signed by President Clinton as instructing them to try to capture bin Laden.
"They believed that the only acceptable context for killing bin Laden was a credible capture operation. 'We always talked about how much easier it would have been to try to kill him,'" a former chief of the bin Laden station told the Commission.
"Working level CIA officers were frustrated by what they saw as the policy restraints of having to instruct their assets to mount a capture operation," the Commission statement said.
Commission staffer Hurley detailed one attempt to recruit indigenous Afghan forces in a bin Laden capture operation, explaining, "When Northern Alliance leader Massoud was briefed on the carefully worded instructions for him, the briefer recalled that Massoud laughed and said, 'You Americans are crazy. You guys never change.'"
... Last week NBC News quoted former CIA official Gary Schroen as saying that White House orders to spare bin Laden's life cut the chances of getting him in half, from 50 to 25 percent.
Schroen's revelation - now confirmed by the 9/11 Commission - was ignored by the mainstream press beyond its initial coverage by NBC.
NewsMax.com
Wednesday, Mar. 24, 2004 10:26 AM EST
"You
cannot explain to me why we have not
captured or killed the tallest man
in Afghanistan." "You
know... the
job which we should have done
1...
which should have been our primary
focus, to find [you know]
bin Laden and eliminate al
Qaeda." hear
hillary
clinton "Mr.
bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He
was expelled from Saudi Arabia in
'91 and he went to the
Sudan. We'd
been hearing that the Sudanese
wanted America to start dealing with
them again. They released him
[bin Laden]. At
the time, '96, he had committed no
crime against America, so
I
did not bring him
here
because we had no basis on which to
hold him, though
we knew he wanted to commit crimes
against
America.3 So
I pleaded with the Saudis to take
him, 'cause they could have; but
they thought it was a hot potato.
They didn't and that's how he wound
up in Afghanistan." hear
bill clinton No one
paid much attention to what may turn out to be
even more incriminating: clinton's curious
explanation of the missile strike at Kandahur
that took out a phalanxlike formation of...
empty tents... and allowed bin Laden (and the
Mideast Muslim ego) to escape unscathed.
Ever
notice how a crook volunteers way too much
information when he's trying to explain away his
crimes? This is especially true when the crook
thinks you're an idiot and he's a genius. "When
I bombed his training camp and tried to
kill him and his high command in 1998
after the African -Embassy bombings,
some people criticized me for doing it.
We just barely missed him by a couple
of hours.
I think whoever told us he was going to
be there told somebody who told him
that our missiles might be there. I
think we were ratted
out.7"
bill
clinton clinton's
reaction--or should I say non-reaction-- to the
USS Cole bombing in 2000--an unambiguous act of
war--validates Albright's assertion. clinton's
refusal to take bin Laden in 1996--validates
Albright's assertion. That
clinton summarily
ignored and urged all of us to
ignore
the first attack on American soil since Pearl
Harbor, the 1993 WTC bombing--ignore the
first major Islamofascist terrorist attack on
the continental United States!!--validates
Albright's assertion. The fact
that "our national mourner," bill "I feel your
pain" clinton, never even visited the site--he
was only 15 minutes away mere days after the
1993 WTC bombing--validates Albright's assertion
like nothing else.
This
legacy confab
is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's
deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in
real time of the way in which the clinton years
were about a legacy that was incidentally a
presidency. Madeleine
Albright captured the essence of this
dysfunctional
presidency
best when she explained why clinton couldn't go
after bin Laden. According
to Richard
Miniter,
the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet
meeting that would decide the disposition of the
USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to
say, that would decide to do what
it had always done when a "bimbo" was not
spilling the beans on the clintons:
Nothing].
Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for
this unambiguous act of war. Albright
explained that a [sham] Mideast accord
would yield [if not peace for the
principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for
clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton
could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize
good-bye. If clinton
liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption,
perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew
Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it
was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that
produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled
the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global
danger. Feckless
clinton inaction and feckless clinton
action serve only to reinforce the
almost universally held notion: the
clinton calculus was, is, and always
will be, solely self-serving.
It
is the
clintons' bin-Laden-emboldening
inaction to the attack on the USS
Cole
and the clintons'
bin-Laden-emboldening token,
ineffectual, August 1998 missile
strikes of aspirin factories and empty
tents that eliminate "bin-Laden-emboldenment
avoidance" as the rationale for the
latter decision and support "wag the
dog," instead. In
the case of the non-response to the
attack on the Cole, an unambiguous act
of war, the clinton rationale was a
clinton Nobel Peace Prize by Arab
appeasement. i.e., a clinton Nobel
Peace Prize by bin-Laden-emboldenment.
And
in the case of the curiously-timed,
ineffectual (and, therefore,
bin-Laden-emboldening) token missile
strikes, the clinton rationale was
Lewinsky-recantation
distraction
-- clearly not bin-Laden-emboldenment
avoidance. (This
is not to say there wasn't a Nobel
factor here, too. Obsolete
intelligence, bolstered by the
redundancy of a clinton tipoff, ensured
that both bin Laden and the Mideast
Muslim ego would escape
unscathed.) "I
remember exactly what
happened. Bruce Lindsey said
to me on the phone, 'My God, a
second plane has hit the
tower.' And I said, 'Bin Laden
did this.' that's the first
thing I said. He said, 'How
can you be sure?' I said
'Because only bin Laden and
the Iranians could set up the
network to do this and they
[the Iranians]
wouldn't do it because they
have a country in targets.
Bin
Laden did
it.'
I
thought that my
virtual
obsession 2
with him was well placed and I
was full of regret that I
didn't get him." bill
clinton INTERVIEW
Osama
bin
Laden
(DID
THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)
(Part
One)
by
Mia t, 2.15.06

Saturday,
Jan. 28, 2006
Chitchat with Jane Pauley
San Francisco, CA
Sunday,
Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton
Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition
Offer

hen
the
damning tape surfaced,
focus was naturally on bill clinton's
(oops!) admission.
I agree. We
were ratted out. bill clinton could not
afford to capture or kill bin Laden.
This
information courtesy of none other than
Madeleine Albright.
Sunday,
Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton
Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition
Offer
7.
The ABC miniseries, 'The Path to 9/11,' reports
that Albright, herself, did the ratting, which
makes sense: Madeleine Albright was obviously
the clintons' Nobel Peace Prize point man and
facilitator.
'MAKE
IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and
CO.
(HEAR HILLARY +
BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)
by
Mia t, 2.13.06

ALBRIGHT
INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE
(and
doesn't even know it)
by
Mia T, 4.28.06

ALBRIGHT1:
'Bin Laden and his Network Declared
War2
on
the United States and Struck First and We Have Suffered
Deeply'
COPYRIGHT
MIA T 2006
h
e a r
--c
l i n t o
n
--l
o s e
--i
t
by Mia T,
11.11.05
Sunday,
Sept 3, 2002
Larry
King Live
(may
1998)